Monday, January 11, 2021

The wave-particle duality explained: the electron contains a photon, this means in some experiments the electron behave as a wave

 

The wave-particle duality explained: the electron contains a photon, this means in some experiments the electron behave as a wave

 

“Bohr’s Complementarity Principle is wrong because electrons have the properties of particles and sometimes the properties of waves together.”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is wrong because Bohr’s Complementarity Principle is wrong.”

Adrian Ferent

 

 “The wave-particle duality explained: the electron contains a photon, this means in some experiments the electron behaves as a wave.”

Adrian Ferent

 

“For Einstein wave-particle duality was a new kind of difficulty, but was not a difficulty and was explained with Ferent Quantum Gravity.”

Adrian Ferent

 

“I am the first who explained the wave-particle duality for the electron: the electron is a photon around Dark Matter.”

Adrian Ferent

 

“I discovered what the electron is and I explained the wave-particle duality with Ferent Quantum Gravity.”

Adrian Ferent

 

“All the physicists, the greatest scientists, the Nobel Laureates…did Not explain the wave-particle duality.”

Adrian Ferent

 

Wave–particle duality is the concept in quantum mechanics that every particle can be described as either a particle or a wave, depending upon the circumstances of the experiment.

 

Wave-particle duality is the possession by light and electrons of both wavelike and particle-like characteristics.

 

Wave-particle duality refers to the fundamental property of matter where at one moment it appears like a wave and at another moment it acts like a particle.

 

The description of light as waves was well well-known, but the photoelectric effect introduced firm evidence of a particle nature as well.

The particle properties of electrons were well known when the DeBroglie hypothesis and the subsequent experiments by Davisson and Germer established the wave nature of the electron.

 

Albert Einstein wrote:

‘We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do.’

 

De Broglie had proposed a pilot wave construct to explain the observed wave-particle duality. Each particle has a well-defined position and momentum, but is guided by a wave function derived from Schrödinger's equation.

 

Double-slit experiment

In 1807 Thomas Young asserted that light has the properties of a wave in an experiment called Young’s Interference Experiment, showed that lights (waves) passing through two slits (double-slit) add together or cancel each other and then interference fringes appear. This phenomenon cannot be explained unless light is considered as a wave.

 

The double-slit experiment with electrons. The pictures show the pattern you get on the second wall as more and more electrons are fired. The result is a stripy interference pattern. The spots where electrons hit, build up to replicate the interference pattern from a wave.

Particles such as electrons combine characteristics of particles and characteristics of waves. That's the famous wave particle duality of quantum mechanics.

 

The photoelectric effect is a phenomenon where photons (light quanta) have the properties not only of a wave but also of a particle.

 

To explain what the wave-particle duality means is a key point of debate in quantum physics.

There are many interpretations but they are all bound by the same set of wave equations and must explain the same experimental observations.

This ability to describe reality in the form of a wave function, generally in the form of the Schrodinger equation is at the heart of quantum mechanics.

 

There is no consensus on the genuine meaning of wave-particle duality and the interpretation of quantum theory.

The wave-particle duality is a fundamental property of the nature. At the same time, it is one of the greatest mysteries of modern physics.

 

Sometimes electrons behave as particles in beta radiation and sometimes as waves in electron diffraction, in the double-slit experiment.

 

What is the electron in Ferent Quantum Gravity?

 

“Light comes from the electron, in particle colliders, it is the proof that the electron contains a photon”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The electron is a photon around Dark Matter”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The Dark Matter electron is the Dark Matter inside the electron”

 Adrian Ferent

 

This is another proof that the electron is not an elementary particle and the Standard Model is wrong.

 

“The Spin of the electron is the Orbital angular momentum of the photon within the electron”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The circumference of the electron is λ / 2, half of photon wavelength”

 Adrian Ferent

 

“The electron has an electric field due to the photon inside the electron”

 Adrian Ferent

 

“I am the first who explained the wave-particle duality for the electron: the electron is a photon around Dark Matter.”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The wave-particle duality explained: the electron contains a photon, this means the electron in some experiments behave as a wave.”

Adrian Ferent

 

Bohr’s solution was the principle of Complementarity.

The Complementarity Principle says that sometimes electrons have the properties of particles and sometimes the properties of waves, but never both together.

 

This means:

 

“Bohr’s Complementarity Principle is wrong because electrons have the properties of particles and sometimes the properties of waves together.”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is wrong because Bohr’s Complementarity Principle is wrong.”

Adrian Ferent

 

Plagiarism: to write a book about Einstein Gravitation theory, to explain Einstein GTR in your own words.

It's Einstein's discovery, not yours.

That is why all physics books are Plagiarism, because the author explains a physicist theory using his own words.

 

That is why I discovered a new Gravitation theory, Ferent Quantum Gravity.

 

“All the physicists, the greatest scientists, the Nobel Laureates…did Not explain the wave-particle duality.”

Adrian Ferent

 

The equation for an elementary particle made of 2 particles, a Matter particle and a Dark Matter particle, is the Ferent equation for elementary particle as a quantum system:

 

“Ferent equation for elementary particles:”

Adrian Ferent

 

This is a linear partial differential equation that describes the wave function of a quantum-mechanical system made of 2 particles, a Matter particle and a Dark Matter particle.

 

“Ferent equation for elementary particle, made of 2 particles, a Matter particle and a Dark Matter particle, is the Unification between Matter and Dark Matter!”

Adrian Ferent

 

“For Einstein wave-particle duality was a new kind of difficulty, but was not a difficulty and was explained with Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

Einstein was right saying: “You know, it would be sufficient to understand the electron” which is still true today.

 

“I discovered what the electron is and I explained the wave-particle duality with Ferent Quantum Gravity.”

Adrian Ferent

 

442. I am the first who discovered that the Bohr’s Complementarity Principle is wrong because electrons have the properties of particles and sometimes the properties of waves together

 

443. I am the first who discovered that The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is wrong because Bohr’s Complementarity Principle is wrong

 

444. I am the first who explained the wave-particle duality for the electron: the electron is a photon around Dark Matter

 

445. I am the first who discovered that for Einstein wave-particle duality was a new kind of difficulty, but was not a difficulty and was explained with Ferent Quantum Gravity

 

446. I am the first who explained the wave-particle duality: the electron contains a photon, this means in some experiments the electron behave as a wave

 

447. I am the first who discovered what the electron is and I explained the wave-particle duality with Ferent Quantum Gravity

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348382581_The_wave-particle_duality_explained_The_electron_contains_a_photon_this_means_in_some_experiments_the_electron_behave_as_a_wave

 

Friday, January 8, 2021

Because light comes from the electron, in particle colliders, it is the proof that the electron contains a photon

 

Because light comes from the electron, in particle colliders, it is the proof that the electron contains a photon

 

“In the particle accelerator the electron becomes smaller and smaller”

Adrian Ferent

 

“In the particle accelerator the electron becomes smaller and smaller because the frequency of the photon inside the electron becomes bigger and bigger”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The light comes from the photon inside the electron, in particle colliders”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Because light comes from the electron, in particle colliders, it is the proof that the electron contains a photon”

Adrian Ferent

 

“I do not use references because I discovered these theories”

Adrian Ferent

 

“How Plagiarism begins:

Many students want to become great scientists, but after memorizing many books, after obtaining many diplomas, the vast majority of them realize that they cannot discover anything”

Adrian Ferent

 

All scientists did not discover what happens to particles in particle accelerators.

 

How scientists do explain particle collision? They explain the same, plagiarizing each other:

 

“All the physicists, the greatest scientists, the Nobel Laureates…do Not understand particle collision”

Adrian Ferent

 

Some examples:

 

“As the nuclei travel faster and faster, their surrounding fields are squished into disks, making them much more concentrated. When two lead ions pass closely enough that their electromagnetic fields swoosh through one another, the high-energy photons which ultimately make up these fields can interact.”

https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/a-collision-of-light

 

Here is another example:

James Beacham is a post-doctoral researcher at CERN with the Ohio State University

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcjKY5EBrCw

 

James Beacham said that Higgs boson is not inside the proton, Dark Matter is not inside the proton, the protons come close enough and “feel each other”…

 

Ferent said exactly opposite of what Beacham said in protons collisions:

Higgs boson is inside the proton.

Dark Matter is inside the proton.

This is wrong: the protons come close enough and “feel each other”. Ferent said you collide photons.

 

James Beacham like all the physicists, the greatest scientists, all Nobel Laureates… do Not understand anything about particle collision.

 

Another funny explanation:

“When two protons graze each other, their squished electromagnetic fields intersect. These fields skip the classical “amplify” etiquette that applies at low energies and instead follow the rules outlined by quantum electrodynamics. Through these new laws, the two fields can merge and become the “E” in E=mc².”

 

Another example:

“In particle physics, the term “collide” can mean that two protons glide through each other, and their fundamental components pass so close together that they can talk to each other. If their voices are loud enough and resonate in just the right way, they can pluck deep hidden fields that will sing their own tune in response—by producing new particles.”

 

Another example:

“We're focusing on an electron and a positron interacting with one another at high energies. 

One thing that can result from such an interaction is the production of a pair of W bosons. There's the conventional way you would think about this as a sequence of images – the electron-positron pair getting closer and closer until, ultimately, something happens, the electron-positron pair vanishes, and the W bosons simply materialize”

 

The photons can collide and produce W bosons is that at the highest energies, those forces combine to make the electroweak force.

 

At what velocity does an electron emits a photon?

 

“Because the electron is a photon around Dark Matter, the electron receives and emits photons with the speed of light”

Adrian Ferent

 

At what velocity does an electron emits a photon? The answer is another proof for Ferent Quantum Gravity (FQG).

 

In modern physics a charged particle emits and absorbs energy, but its mechanism was not discovered.

 

This means:

All the Nobel Laureates, all the scientists, your professors…were not able to answer to this question:

At what velocity does an electron emits a photon?

 

If you want to have fun, just ask your professors these questions:

At what velocity does an electron emits a photon?

Does have photon an acceleration time?

 

The internet is like a ‘comedy book’ with answers to these questions:

 

Feynman's answer to the question:

 

“An electron emits an ordinary photon in response to being struck by a reverse-time ("advanced") photon that has traveled backward in time from some point in the future.” Some point in the future" could range from femtoseconds (or less) away up to billions of years in the future. The real photon that is emitted in response to the recoil-inducing, backwards-in-time photon travels along the classical time path as a normal or "retarded" photon (no I did not make that up), and eventually strikes the very same target that emitted the advanced photon sometime in the future.”

 

Another scientist said:

“The opposite happens when an electron emits a photon. The photon is not selected from a "well" of photons living in the atom; it is created instantaneously out of the vacuum. The electron in the high energy level is instantly converted into a lower energy-level electron and a photon. There is no in-between state where the photon is being constructed. It instantly pops into existence.”

 

“I do not use references because I discovered these theories”

Adrian Ferent

 

How I explained the light in particle colliders:

 

“In the particle accelerator the electron becomes smaller and smaller”

Adrian Ferent

 

Because:

 

“In the particle accelerator the electron becomes smaller and smaller because the frequency of the photon inside the electron becomes bigger and bigger”

Adrian Ferent

 

From where does the light come inside the particle collider?

 

“The light comes from the photon inside the electron, in particle colliders”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Because light comes from the electron, in particle colliders, it is the proof that the electron contains a photon”

Adrian Ferent

 

This is another proof that Ferent Quantum Gravity is right!

 

“I explained Particle physics with Dark Matter from Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The electron is a photon around Dark Matter”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The Dark Matter electron is the Dark Matter inside the electron”

 Adrian Ferent

 

This is another proof that the electron is not an elementary particle and the Standard Model is wrong.

 

What scientists did not understand?

 

“High energy particles, Z and W bosons are not created from electron-positron collisions, they are created from photons collisions in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

“I am the first who explained the accelerated elementary particles: The elementary particles are not the same as when the acceleration began in particle accelerators”

Adrian Ferent

 

“All the physicists, the greatest scientists, the Nobel Laureates…do Not understand particle collision”

Adrian Ferent

 

The equation for an elementary particle made of 2 particles, a Matter particle and a Dark Matter particle, is the Ferent equation for elementary particle as a quantum system:

 

“Ferent equation for elementary particles:”

Adrian Ferent

 

This is a linear partial differential equation that describes the wave function of a quantum-mechanical system made of 2 particles, a Matter particle and a Dark Matter particle.

 

“Ferent equation for elementary particle, made of 2 particles, a Matter particle and a Dark Matter particle, is the Unification between Matter and Dark Matter!”

Adrian Ferent

 

“There is no plagiarism in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

“I use quotation in Ferent Quantum Gravity, to protect my theory from plagiarism”

 Adrian Ferent

 

The majority scientists, physicists, professors… did not discover anything, that is why they look to stole from others.

I think this is a very important problem today in Science.

 

“How Plagiarism begins:

Many students want to become great scientists, but after memorizing many books, after obtaining many diplomas, the vast majority of them realize that they cannot discover anything”

Adrian Ferent

 

“What is the difference between Politics and Science?

 

Everyone writes books about politics.

About Science, Scientific Discoveries no one writes one row"

Adrian Ferent

 

438. I am the first who discovered that in the particle accelerator the electron becomes smaller and smaller

 

439. I am the first who discovered that in the particle accelerator the electron becomes smaller and smaller because the frequency of the photon inside the electron becomes bigger and bigger

 

440. I am the first who discovered that the light comes from the photon inside the electron, in particle colliders

 

441. I am the first who discovered that because light comes from the electron, in particle colliders, it is the proof that the electron contains a photon

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348339066_Because_light_comes_from_the_electron_in_particle_colliders_it_is_the_proof_that_the_electron_contains_a_photon

 

Saturday, December 19, 2020

The speed of the photon, inside the electron is constant, v = 0.04c

 

“The speed of the photon, inside the electron is constant, v = 0.04c”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The photon wavelength is λ = 4πr, r the electron radius”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Because of the charge invariance, the ‘rf’ is constant”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The speed of the photon inside the electron is λf”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Because ‘rf’ is constant, the speed of the photon, ‘v’, inside the electron is constant”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The speed of the photon, inside the electron is constant, v = 1.2× 10^7 m/s”

Adrian Ferent

 

“In Ferent Quantum Gravity the relativistic invariance of charge is caused by the constant speed of the photon inside the electron”

Adrian Ferent

 

“You learn that the electron is an elementary particle from your professors, from the greatest scientists, from your books, from the Standard Model... while I calculated the speed of the photon inside the electron”

Adrian Ferent

 

The elementary charge is the electric charge carried by a single electron.

This elementary charge is a fundamental physical constant.

 

The electron stored energy as a result of the photon as standing wave within the electorn and the kinetic energy as a traveling wave beyond the electron radius.

 

Charge invariance refers to the fixed value of the electric charge of a particle regardless of its motion.

 

At any speed the charge of the electron is the same.

The charge of an electron remains the same even it is moving close to the speed of light.

 

The actual origin of the relativistic invariance of charge is unknown.

 

“Relativistic invariance - because the electron is a photon around Dark Matter and the speed of light is the same for all inertial frames, any particle that has charge Q, no matter how fast it goes, always has charge Q”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The photon wavelength is λ = 4πr, r the electron radius”

Adrian Ferent

 

This means: λ/2 = 2πr,  r = λ / 4π

 

“The photon inside the electron, inside the volume, gives the electric charge”

Adrian Ferent

 

The electron charge Q:

 

Where K is a constant and f = 10^20 Hz,  h = 6.6 × 10^(-34) Js,  r = 10^(-14) m

This means: Q = 1.6 × 10^(-19) C, the electron charge!

 

“I calculated the charge created by the photon with f = 10^20 Hz inside the electron Q = 1.6 × 10^(-19) C, the electron charge”

Adrian Ferent

 

Conservation of electric charge, another proof for FQG theory!

 

“Because of the charge invariance, the ‘rf’ is constant”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The speed of the photon inside the electron is λf”

Adrian Ferent

 

If v is the photon speed inside the electron and because: r = λ / 4π

This means: rf = v / 4π

 

“Because ‘rf’ is constant, the speed of the photon, ‘v’, inside the electron is constant”

Adrian Ferent

 

This means the photon speed: v = 4πrf

Because rf = 10^6 m/s, v= 1.2× 10^7 m/s

 

“The speed of the photon, inside the electron is constant, v = 1.2× 10^7 m/s”

Adrian Ferent

 

Because c = 3× 10^8 m/s, v/c = 0.04

 

“The speed of the photon, inside the electron is constant, v = 0.04c”

Adrian Ferent

 

“You learned from all physicists, all scientists, all Nobel Laureates… that the actual origin of the relativistic invariance of charge is unknown”

Adrian Ferent

 

“In Ferent Quantum Gravity the relativistic invariance of charge is caused by the constant speed of the photon inside the electron”

Adrian Ferent

 

“You learn that the electron is an elementary particle from your teachers, from the greatest scientists, from your books, from the Standard Model... while I calculated the speed of the photon inside the electron”

Adrian Ferent

 

430. I am the first who discovered that the speed of the photon, inside the electron is constant, v = 0.04c

 

431. I am the first who discovered that the photon wavelength is λ = 4πr, r the electron radius

 

432. I am the first who discovered that because of the charge invariance, the ‘rf’ is constant

 

433. I am the first who discovered that the speed of the photon inside the electron is λf

 

434. I am the first who discovered that because ‘rf’ is constant, the speed of the photon, ‘v’, inside the electron is constant

 

435. I am the first who discovered that the speed of the photon, inside the electron is constant, v = 1.2× 10^7 m/s

 

436. I am the first who discovered that in Ferent Quantum Gravity the relativistic invariance of charge is caused by the constant speed of the photon inside the electron

 

437. I am the first who discovered that you learn that the electron is an elementary particle from your professors, from the greatest scientists, from your books, from the Standard Model... while I calculated the speed of the photon inside the electron

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347486323_The_speed_of_the_photon_inside_the_electron_is_constant_v_004c

 

 

Saturday, December 5, 2020

High energy particles, Z and W bosons are not created from electron-positron collisions, they are created from photons collisions in Ferent Quantum Gravity

 

“High energy particles, Z and W bosons are not created from electron-positron collisions, they are created from photons collisions in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

“I am the first who explained the accelerated elementary particles: The elementary particles are not the same as when the acceleration began in particle accelerators”

Adrian Ferent

 

“At 50 GeV the electron is contracted to d / 100000, close to the speed of light. The electron is not the same as when the acceleration began”

Adrian Ferent

 

“In Ferent Quantum Special relativity, the length contraction, time dilation start from the smallest particles, like electrons”

Adrian Ferent

 

“For Einstein, Minkowsky length contraction, time dilation is from Outside, not from the Inside”

Adrian Ferent

 

“All the physicists, the scientists, Nobel Laureates… do Not understand particle collision”

Adrian Ferent

 

“I explained particle collisions, because I discovered what the electron is”

Adrian Ferent

 

“They collide photons, not electrons in particle collider”

Adrian Ferent

 

“It is not from the kinetic energy, it is from the inside the electron, the speed of the electron change the electron”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Inside the accelerated electron the photon it increases its energy, because the Dark Matter electron insides the electron it increases its energy”

 Adrian Ferent

 

A particle accelerator uses electromagnetic fields to force charged particles to very high speeds, energies and to contain them in well-defined beams.

There are more than 30000 accelerators in operation around the world but only about 1% have energies above 1 GeV.

 

In the case of a collider where the collision point is at rest in the laboratory frame, p as vectors: p1 = -p2

The center of mass energy Ec, the sum of the total energy of a particle from each beam:

 Ec = E1 + E2 

 

When LEP started up, they collide electrons and positrons at total energies of about 90 GeV, producing many numbers of Z particles. 

The Z particle has a mass of 91.19 GeV, nearly 100 times that of the proton. The W is slightly lighter, with a mass of 80.4 GeV.

 

At CERN, electrons and positrons were accelerated to energies of 100 GeV. For such particles, v = 0.999 999 999 95c and γ is 200,000.

 

Electron–positron annihilation occurs when an electron and a positron collide

At low energy two photons are created, each with energy equal to the rest energy of the electron or positron (0.511 MeV).

At energies beyond the mass of the carriers of the weak force, the W and Z bosons are produced.

The heaviest particle pairs yet produced by electron–positron annihilation in particle accelerators are W+ and W- pairs.

On 9 July 1996, shortly after LEP's energy had been increased to 161 GeV per beam, just enough to make the mass of the pair of W particles.

 

How all the scientists around the world do understand particle collision?

Or how they do NOT understand?

 

Here is an example: James Beacham is a post-doctoral researcher with The Ohio State University, based full-time at CERN, where he is a member of the ATLAS Experiment collaboration, one of the two teams that discovered the Higgs boson in 2012.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcjKY5EBrCw

 

James Beacham said that Higgs boson is not inside the proton, Dark Matter is not inside the proton, the protons come close enough and “feel each other”,  it is not like car collision, from 2 bicycles come 2 skateboards!!!

 

Ferent said exactly opposite of what Beacham said in protons collisions:

Higgs boson is inside the proton

Dark Matter is inside the proton

This is wrong: the protons come close enough and “feel each other”, because Ferent said you collide photons

From 2 bicycles come 2 skateboards, he does not understand because Ferent said that you collide photons

 

James Beacham like all the physicists, the greatest scientists, all Nobel Laureates… do Not understand anything about particle collision.

 

“All the physicists, the greatest scientists, the Nobel Laureates…do Not understand particle collision”

Adrian Ferent

 

The equation for an elementary particle made of 2 particles, a Matter particle and a Dark Matter particle, is the Ferent equation for elementary particle as a quantum system:

 

“Ferent equation for elementary particles”

 

This is a linear partial differential equation that describes the wave function of a quantum-mechanical system made of 2 particles, a Matter particle and a Dark Matter particle.

 

“Ferent equation for elementary particle, made of 2 particles, a Matter particle and a Dark Matter particle, is the Unification between Matter and Dark Matter!”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Einstein, all Nobel Laureates, the greatest scientists, your professors…did not understand Special theory of relativity and General theory of relativity (Gravity), they did not find a Quantum interpretation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

Einstein did not explain Time dilation. In Ferent Quantum Gravity Time dilation starts from the inside, from the smallest particles, from atoms, electrons to molecules, to the body.

 

“Einstein did not explain Time dilation; he did not find a ‘molecular’ explanation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Time dilation or Freeze from the Inside when at high speed the smallest particles like electrons inside molecules, inside the body have length contraction and time dilation”

Adrian Ferent

 

“In Ferent Quantum Special relativity, the length contraction, time dilation start from the smallest particles, like electrons”

Adrian Ferent

 

I will answer to this question: it is from the kinetic energy like you learned from your professors, or it is from the inside the electron, because the speed of the electron changes the electron?

 

“For Einstein, Minkowsky length contraction, time dilation is from Outside, not from the Inside”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The electron is a photon around Dark Matter”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The high energy Gravitons emitted by Dark Matter keep the photon inside the electron”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The electrons have the same charge because the photon inside the electron has the energy ~ 0.5 MeV and frequency ~10^20 Hz”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The photon wavelength is 2πr, r the electron radius”

Adrian Ferent

 

This means: λ = 2πr,  r = λ / 2π

The electron diameter d = λ / π

 

Because   λ = c / f, the diameter d = c / f π

 

An example:

Electron energy ~ 0.5 MeV 

When f =  10^20 Hz, the electron diameter:  d= 10^(-12) m

 

Electron energy ~ 50 GeV 

When f =  10^25 Hz, the electron diameter:  d= 10^(-17) m

 

“At 50GeV the electron diameter is contracted 100000 times, than at low energy at 0.5 MeV”

Adrian Ferent

 

This is the answer:

 

“At 50GeV the electron is contracted to d / 100000, close to the speed of light. The electron is not the same as when the acceleration began”

Adrian Ferent


No one understood the particle collision:

 

“I am the first who explained the accelerated elementary particles: The elementary particles are not the same as when the acceleration began in particle accelerators”

Adrian Ferent

 

What nobody understand:

 

“They collide photons, not electrons in particle collider”

Adrian Ferent

 

“It is not from the kinetic energy, it is from the inside the electron, the speed of the electron change the electron”

Adrian Ferent

 

They did not understand particle accelerators!

For Einstein, all Nobel Laureates, the greatest scientists…they collide particles and out of Nowhere photons appear in collision!

 

“I explained particle collisions, because I discovered what the electron is”

Adrian Ferent

 

This is possible because the accelerated Dark Matter electron it increases its energy!

 

 “Inside the accelerated electron the photon it increases its energy, because the Dark Matter electron insides the electron it increases its energy”

 Adrian Ferent

 

All scientists do not understand particle physics, the Standard Model is wrong because elementary particles like the electron is composed of a photon around Dark Matter electron.

 

Conclusion:

 

“Ferent Quantum Gravity explains particle collisions”

Adrian Ferent

 

“High energy particles, Z and W bosons are not created from electron-positron collisions, they are created from photons collisions in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346647783_High_energy_particles_Z_and_W_bosons_are_not_created_from_electron-positron_collisions_they_are_created_from_photons_collisions_in_Ferent_Quantum_Gravity

 

420. I am the first who discovered that high energy particles, Z and W bosons are not created from electron-positron collisions, they are created from photons collisions in Ferent Quantum Gravity

 

421. I am the first who explained the accelerated elementary particles: The elementary particles are not the same as when the acceleration began in particle accelerators

 

422. I am the first who discovered that at 50GeV the electron is contracted to d / 100000, close to the speed of light. The electron is not the same as when the acceleration began

 

423. I am the first who discovered that in Ferent Quantum Special relativity, the length contraction, time dilation start from the smallest particles, like electrons

 

424. I am the first who discovered that for Einstein, Minkowsky length contraction, time dilation is from Outside, not from the Inside

 

425. I am the first who discovered that all the physicists, the scientists, Nobel Laureates… do Not understand particle collision

 

426. I am the first who discovered that I explained particle collisions, because I discovered what the electron is

 

427. I am the first who discovered that they collide photons, not electrons in particle collider

 

428. I am the first who discovered that it is not from the kinetic energy, it is from the inside the electron, the speed of the electron change the electron

 

429. I am the first who discovered that inside the accelerated electron the photon it increases its energy, because the Dark Matter electron insides the electron it increases its energy

 

Wednesday, December 2, 2020

Hawking radiation does Not exist, because Gravitons emitted by Black Holes have higher speed and higher energy than the photons in Hawking radiation

 

“Hawking radiation does not exist because in Ferent Quantum Gravity the Gravitons are Faster Than Light”

Adrian Ferent

 

“If the gravitons would have only the speed of light, how you learned from Einstein, the greatest scientists, the light, the photons would escape from a Black Hole and the Hawking radiation would exist”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The graviton’s energy emitted by Black Holes is much higher than photon’s energy in Hawking radiation. This means Hawking radiation does not exist”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Virtual particles do not exist in Ferent Quantum Gravity; virtual particles exist in Quantum Field theory and in Hawking radiation theory”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The 2017, 2019, 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics are frauds because like Hawking, they did not understand Gravitation, Dark Matter and Black Holes”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Hawking radiation does Not exist, because Gravitons emitted by Black Holes have higher speed and higher energy than the photons in Hawking radiation”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Black Holes will not evaporate”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Dark Matter and Black Holes will collapse the Universe, the Big Crunch to the Ferent Wall”

Adrian Ferent

 

Hawking radiation does not exist!

Hawking, Penrose, Einstein…did not understand Black Holes!

 

Hawking radiation is the thermal radiation predicted to be spontaneously emitted by Black holes.

Hawking's discovery followed a visit to Moscow in 1973 where the Soviet scientists convinced him that rotating black holes have to create and emit particles. When Hawking did the calculation, he found that even non-rotating black holes produce radiation.

 

Because of angular momentum conservation for a Black Hole, the Black Hole spins very fast; the matter around the Black Holes spins at 84% of the speed of light.

 

“Hawking radiation does not exist because in Ferent Quantum Gravity the Gravitons are Faster Than Light”

Adrian Ferent

 

Ferent Equation for Photon – Graviton, after n interactions, gravitational redshift:

 

Ferent Quantum Gravity is the most important theory!

 

The Hawking radiation temperature formula is the picture on Hawking’s grave:

 

Hawking radiation is blackbody radiation that is predicted to be released by Black holes, due to quantum effects near the event horizon.

 

Temperature of a Black hole is inversely proportional to its mass, such that: Hawking radiation temperature: T = k / M

The power of the Hawking radiation from a solar mass Black hole turns out to be minuscule: 9 x 10^(-29) W. For a Black hole of one solar mass, we get an evaporation time of 2×10^67 years, much longer than the age of the Universe.

 

Hawking and all the scientists did not understand Gravitation and Black holes.

 

“Black holes are Dark Matter”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Dark Matter does not have temperature”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Gravitons from Black holes transform Matter, ‘heat’ in Dark Matter”

Adrian Ferent

 

Hawking Radiation: black holes will generate virtual particles right at the edge of their event horizons.

 

“Virtual particles do not exist in Ferent Quantum Gravity; virtual particles exist in Quantum Field theory and in Hawking radiation theory”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Event horizons do not exist in Ferent Quantum Gravity, event horizons exist in Einstein General Theory of Relativity. At Event horizons there are only Gravitons without Hawking radiation.”

Adrian Ferent

 

I calculated: the graviton’s energy emitted by black holes is much higher than 1 GeV.

 

This is another proof that Hawking radiation does not exist:

 

“The graviton’s energy emitted by Black Holes is much higher than photon’s energy in Hawking radiation. This means Hawking radiation does not exist”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Because Black Holes are Dark Matter, Black Holes do not have temperature”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Gravitational force is mediated by gravitons faster than the speed of light, with negative momentum”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The 2017, 2019, 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics are frauds because like Hawking, they did not understand Gravitation, Dark Matter and Black Holes”

Adrian Ferent

 

“If gravitons have only the speed of light will not be able to keep constellations together“

Adrian Ferent

 

A graviton needs less then one second to travel between stars located within 10 light-years.

A light year value is ly = 9.460536207×10^15 m, the speed of the graviton va = 1.001762 × 10^17 m/s and t = 10 × ly / va , this means t < 1s.

 

“If the gravitons would have only the speed of light, how you learned from Einstein, the greatest scientists, the light, the photons would escape from a Black hole and the Hawking radiation would exist”

Adrian Ferent


”In Ferent Quantum Gravity gravitons have a much higher speed than the speed of light and the photons from Hawking radiation cannot escape the Black Hole. This means Hawking radiation does not exist”

Adrian Ferent

 

You learned from your professors that nothing can travel faster than light; I explained that the Gravitons are faster than light.

This is another proof that Ferent Quantum Gravity is right and Einstein Gravitation theory is wrong.

This is another proof that LIGO is a fraud, because gravitational waves are faster than light.

           

“Gravitational waves are carried by gravitons”

Adrian Ferent

    

Conclusion:

 

“Hawking radiation does Not exist, because Gravitons emitted by Black Holes have higher speed and higher energy than the photons in Hawking radiation”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Black Holes will not evaporate”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Dark Matter and Black Holes will collapse the Universe, the Big Crunch to the Ferent Wall”

Adrian Ferent

 

412. I am the first who discovered that Hawking radiation does not exist because in Ferent Quantum Gravity the Gravitons are Faster Than Light

 

413. I am the first who discovered that if the gravitons would have only the speed of light, how you learned from Einstein, the greatest scientists, the light, the photons would escape from a Black Hole and the Hawking radiation would exist

 

414. I am the first who discovered that the graviton’s energy emitted by Black Holes is much higher than photon’s energy in Hawking radiation. This means Hawking radiation does not exist

 

415. I am the first who discovered that Virtual particles do not exist in Ferent Quantum Gravity; virtual particles exist in Quantum Field theory and in Hawking radiation theory

 

416. I am the first who discovered that the 2017, 2019, 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics are frauds because like Hawking, they did not understand Gravitation, Dark Matter and Black Holes

 

417. I am the first who discovered that Hawking radiation does Not exist, because Gravitons emitted by Black Holes have higher speed and higher energy than the photons in Hawking radiation

 

418. I am the first who discovered that Black Holes will not evaporate

 

419. I am the first who discovered that Dark Matter and Black Holes will collapse the Universe, the Big Crunch to the Ferent Wall

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346562151_Hawking_radiation_does_Not_exist_because_Gravitons_emitted_by_Black_Holes_have_higher_speed_and_higher_energy_than_the_photons_in_Hawking_radiation

 

 

Monday, November 23, 2020

Einstein did not explain Time dilation. In FQG Time dilation starts from the inside, from the smallest particles, from atoms, to molecules, to the body. Colliders explained.

 

“Einstein did not explain Time dilation; he did not find a ‘molecular’ explanation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

“At high speed the mass of the molecules (all the particles mass inside the molecules), will increase, they need more time to oscillate and this explains the Time dilation”

Adrian Ferent

 

“At high speed the mass of the molecules will increase, they need longer time to oscillate and the atomic clocks and the mechanical clocks will tick slower”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Time dilation or Freeze from the Inside when at high speed the smallest particles inside molecules, inside the body have the de Broglie wavelength smaller and their mass bigger”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Freeze from the Inside is from atoms, to molecules, to the body”

Adrian Ferent

 

“In Ferent Quantum Gravity Time dilation starts from inside, from the smallest particles, from atoms, to molecules, to the body”

Adrian Ferent

 

“From Ferent Quantum Gravity, Colliders are efficient because they collide Frozen particles, where the de Broglie wavelength of the particles is smaller than their diameter”

Adrian Ferent

 

“At high speed because for the molecules inside the body the wavelength are very small the body will contract, cool down, Freeze from the Inside and the Twin will die”

Adrian Ferent

 

“At high speed the mass of the atoms, molecules will increase, the mass of the internal organs will increase and the Twin will die”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The interpretation of Time dilation which you have learned from Einstein, from your professors, from your books, from the greatest scientists… is wrong”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Math is simple, understanding physics is difficult, because not any mathematical solution is right in physics”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Minkowski not Einstein, found a mathematical solution for Time dilation, but not a Quantum solution like in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Einstein, Minkowski...found a mathematical solution for time dilation, length contraction, Gravity, not a Quantum solution because at that time no one knew about Quantum mechanics.

What amazes me is that no one has tried for 100 years to explain with Quantum mechanics time dilation, length contraction, Gravity.

What amazes me even more is that they received in 2017 the Nobel Prize for detecting of Einstein’s gravitational waves, which do not exist in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Einstein, all Nobel Laureates, the greatest scientists, your professors…did not understand Special theory of relativity and General theory of relativity (Gravity), they did not find a Quantum interpretation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

Time dilation, in special relativity: the ‘slowing down’ of a clock as determined by an observer who is in relative motion with respect to that clock.

Simultaneity is required to make a comparison of the rates of clocks carried by the two observers.

A clock moving with respect to an observer appears to run slower than an identical clock at rest with respect to the observer.

 

Theory of relativity predicts a time dilatation in a gravitational field, so that, relative to someone outside of the field, clocks (or atomic processes) go slowly. This retardation is a consequence of the curvature of space-time with which the theory identifies the gravitational field.

 

The Twin paradox: 

Is a thought experiment in Special relativity with twins, one of whom makes a journey into space in a high-speed rocket and returns home to find that the twin who remained on Earth has aged more. 

One of two twins carrying a clock departs on a rocket ship from the other twin, an inertial observer, (nonaccelerating motion), at a certain time, and they rejoin at a later time. In accordance with the time dilation effect, the elapsed time on the clock of the twin on the rocket ship will be smaller than that of the inertial observer twin, the non-inertial twin will have aged less than the inertial observer twin when they rejoin.

 

Einstein in his well-known paper on Special relativity in 1905, he considered that when two clocks were brought together and synchronized and then one was moved away and brought back, the clock which had undergone the traveling would be found to be lagging behind the clock which had stayed put. Einstein considered this to be a consequence of time dilation Special relativity, not a paradox.

 

It is considered a paradox because being that at constant velocity we are unable to discern which twin is non-traveling and which twin travels.

 

Einstein discovered special relativity in 1905 with Minkowski providing his graphical representation in 1908.

The first diagram used a branch of the unit hyperbola t^2-x^2=1, thus illustrating time dilation.

Max Born in 1920 drew Minkowski diagrams by placing the ct′-axis almost perpendicular to the x-axis, as well as the ct-axis to the x′-axis, to demonstrate length contraction and time dilation in the symmetric case of two rods and two clocks moving in opposite direction.

The difference between Special Relativity and general relativity General Relativity is that in General Relativity you can use any metric which is a solution of the Einstein field equations, not just the Minkowski metric.

 

“Einstein, Minkowski...found a mathematical solution for time dilation, length contraction, Gravity, not a Quantum solution because at that time no one knew about Quantum mechanics.

What amazes me is that no one has tried for 100 years to explain with Quantum mechanics time dilation, length contraction, Gravity.

What amazes me even more is that they received in 2017 the Nobel Prize for detecting of Einstein’s gravitational waves, which do not exist in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

How big are Time dilation effects?     

 

Values for Lorentz factor γ:

 

For v/c = 0.1,  γ = 1.005

For v/c = 0.5,  γ = 1.155

For v/c = 0.9,  γ = 2.294

 

How you can see γ only starts to become large at speeds close to c.

In an electron accelerator used to treat cancers, the electrons have an energy of 20 MeV. The speed of such electrons is 0.9997c and γ is 40.

 

An electron cannot go much faster than this, but it can have a lot more energy. At CERN, electrons and positrons were accelerated to energies of 100 GeV. For such particles, v = 0.999 999 999 95c and γ is 200,000.

Nature can produce even larger particle energies. Some particles striking the Earth's upper atmosphere have energies that exceed 2×10^20 eV. If such particles are protons (with mass of about 1 GeV), their speeds would be 0.999 999 999 999 999 999 999 995 c and γ is 10^11. 

 

Electron to a velocity v=10^6 m/s.

From the de Broglie relation we get a wavelength λ≈10^(−10) m, which is about the size of an atom.

This is why we can use electron microscopes to directly probe the structure of atoms in a crystal. 

 

For v=3×10^7m/s , the de Broglie wavelength  λ≈2.4×10^(−11)m

 

The length of any object in a moving frame will appear contracted in the direction of motion.

A ‘molecular’ explanation of the Length contraction, Time dilation is needed. Einstein did not give any explanation.

 

Length contraction: the length ∆x′ of an object as measured in the frame in which it is moving, is shorter than its length ∆x in its own rest frame

∆x′ = ∆x / γ

 

Relativistic mass:

m = γm0

 

Time dilation:

∆t′ = γ∆t

 

Relativistic momentum

p = vγm0

 

The de Broglie wavelength:

ʎ = h/p

 

The de Broglie wavelength for the relativistic mass-energy:

ʎ = h/vγm0

 

At high speed the momentum ‘p’ of the object is high and the wavelength is very small.

 

Ferent ‘molecular’ explanation of the Length contraction, Time dilation:

 

The same thing for the molecules inside the object:

 

At high speed the momentum ‘p’ of the molecules is high and the wavelength is very small.

At high speed the momentum ‘p’ of the molecule is high because the relativistic mass of the molecule is high and the speed of the molecule is high: p = vγm0

This means:

 

“At high speed the mass of the molecules (all the particles mass inside the molecules), will increase, they need more time to oscillate and this explains the Time dilation”

Adrian Ferent

 

“At high speed the mass of the molecules will increase, they need longer time to oscillate and the atomic clocks and the mechanical clocks will tick slower”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Time dilation or Freeze from the Inside when at high speed the smallest particles inside molecules, inside the body have the de Broglie wavelength smaller and their mass bigger”

Adrian Ferent

 

What means Freeze from Inside:

 

“Freeze from the Inside is from atoms, to molecules, to the body”

Adrian Ferent

 

“In Ferent Quantum Gravity Time dilation starts from inside, from the smallest particles, from atoms, to molecules, to the body”

Adrian Ferent

 

I use body to explain the Twin paradox.

 

This is a Quantum explanation of Time dilation.

 

Colliders:

 

In the case of the electron:

 

 “Time dilation or Freeze from the Inside, when the electron has the de Broglie wavelength smaller than their diameter”

Adrian Ferent

 

Electron to a velocity v=10^6 m/s

From the de Broglie relation we get a wavelength λ≈10^(−10) m, which is about the size of an atom.

 

At CERN, electrons and positrons were accelerated to energies of 100 GeV. For such particles, v = 0.999 999 999 95c and γ is 200,000. From the de Broglie relation we get a wavelength smaller than 2.4×10^(-15) m the electron diameter.

 

At CERN when they collide protons, γ is 7000, this means from the de Broglie relation we get a wavelength smaller than1.6×10^(-15) m the proton diameter.

 

“From Ferent Quantum Gravity, Colliders are efficient because they collide Frozen particles, where the de Broglie wavelength of the particles is smaller than their diameter”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Colliders collide Frozen particles, where the de Broglie wavelength of the particles is smaller than their diameter”

Adrian Ferent

 

The Twin paradox in Ferent Quantum Gravity:

 

Only the twin that accelerates to a speed close to the speed of light will feel the effects.

 

“At high speed because for the molecules inside the body the wavelength are very small the body will contract, cool down, Freeze from the Inside and the Twin will die”

Adrian Ferent

 

“At high speed the mass of the atoms, molecules will increase, the mass of the internal organs will increase and the Twin will die”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The Twin will die because will Freeze from the Inside”

Adrian Ferent

 

That is why:

 

“Space travel at very high speeds close to the speed of light is impossible”

Adrian Ferent

 

The Twin paradox!

 

Einstein, all Nobel Laureates, the greatest scientists, your professors… they said that the Twin is Younger!

 

Ferent said that the Twin is Dead!

 

Who is right?

 

“Math is simple, understanding physics is difficult, because not any mathematical solution is right in physics”

Adrian Ferent

 

“What you learned from Einstein, from your professors, from your books, from the greatest scientists… about the Twin paradox is wrong”

Adrian Ferent

 

 “Ferent equation for elementary particles”

Adrian Ferent

 

This is a linear partial differential equation that describes the wave function of a quantum-mechanical system made of 2 particles, a Matter particle and a Dark Matter particle.

 

“In the past, scientists were considered those few who discovered something.

Today scientists are those with university degrees”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Einstein did not explain Time dilation; he did not find a ‘molecular’ explanation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The interpretation of Time dilation which you have learned from Einstein, from your professors, from your books, from the greatest scientists… is wrong”

Adrian Ferent

 

Conclusion:

What you learned from Einstein, from your professors, from your books, from the greatest scientists… about length contraction, time dilation, Gravitation is wrong.

 

“Minkowski not Einstein, found a mathematical solution for Time dilation, but not a Quantum solution like in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Einstein did not explain the length contraction, time dilation, the twin paradox and discovered a geometrical interpretation of Gravity not a Quantum interpretation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity (FQG)”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Einstein, all Nobel Laureates, the greatest scientists, your professors…did not understand Special theory of relativity and General theory of relativity (Gravity), they did not find a Quantum interpretation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

399. I am the first who discovered that Einstein did not explain Time dilation; he did not find a ‘molecular’ explanation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity

 

400. I am the first who discovered that Minkowski not Einstein, found a mathematical solution for Time dilation, but not a Quantum solution like in Ferent Quantum Gravity

 

401. I am the first who discovered that at high speed the mass of the molecules (all the particles mass inside the molecules), will increase, they need more time to oscillate and this explains the Time dilation

 

402. I am the first who discovered that at high speed the mass of the molecules will increase, they need longer time to oscillate and the atomic clocks and the mechanical clocks will tick slower

 

403. I am the first who discovered that Time dilation or Freeze from the Inside when at high speed the smallest particles inside molecules, inside the body have the de Broglie wavelength smaller and their mass bigger

 

404. I am the first who discovered that Freeze from the Inside is from atoms, to molecules, to the body

 

405. I am the first who discovered that in Ferent Quantum Gravity Time dilation starts from inside, from the smallest particles, from atoms, to molecules, to the body

 

406. I am the first who discovered that from Ferent Quantum Gravity, Colliders are efficient because they collide Frozen particles, where the de Broglie wavelength of the particles is smaller than their diameter

 

407. I am the first who discovered that at high speed because for the molecules inside the body the wavelength are very small the body will contract, cool down, Freeze from the Inside and the Twin will die

 

408. I am the first who discovered that at high speed the mass of the atoms, molecules will increase, the mass of the internal organs will increase and the Twin will die

 

409. I am the first who discovered that the interpretation of Time dilation which you have learned from Einstein, from your professors, from your books, from the greatest scientists… is wrong

 

410. I am the first who discovered that Einstein, Minkowski...found a mathematical solution for time dilation, length contraction, Gravity, not a Quantum solution because at that time no one knew about Quantum mechanics.

What amazes me is that no one has tried for 100 years to explain with Quantum mechanics time dilation, length contraction, Gravity.

What amazes me even more is that they received in 2017 the Nobel Prize for detecting of Einstein’s gravitational waves, which do not exist in Ferent Quantum Gravity

 

411. I am the first who discovered that Einstein, all Nobel Laureates, the greatest scientists, your professors…did not understand Special theory of relativity and General theory of relativity (Gravity), they did not find a Quantum interpretation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346169472_Einstein_did_not_explain_Time_dilation_In_FQG_Time_dilation_starts_from_the_inside_from_the_smallest_particles_from_atoms_to_molecules_to_the_body_Colliders_explained

 

Wednesday, November 18, 2020

Einstein did not explain the length contraction, the twin paradox and discovered a geometrical interpretation of Gravity not a Quantum interpretation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity (FQG)

 

“Einstein did not explain the length contraction, the twin paradox and discovered a geometrical interpretation of Gravity not a Quantum interpretation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity (FQG)”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Einstein did not explain the Length contraction; he did not find a ‘molecular’ explanation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

“At high speed for the molecules inside the object the wavelength is very small, they need less space to oscillate and this explains the Length contraction of the object”

Adrian Ferent

 

“The interpretation of Length contraction you have learned from Einstein, from your professors, from your books, from the greatest scientists… is wrong”

Adrian Ferent

 

“At high speed because for the molecules inside the body the wavelength is very small the body will contract, cool down and die”

Adrian Ferent

 

“At high speed the mass of the molecules will increase, the mass of the internal organs will increase and the Twin will die”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Space travel at very high speeds close to the speed of light is impossible”

Adrian Ferent

 

“What you learned from Einstein, from your professors, from your books, from the greatest scientists… about the Twin paradox is wrong”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Gravitation for Einstein is a geometric theory; Gravitation for Ferent is a Quantum theory, Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

The theory of relativity contains two interrelated theories by Einstein:  Special theory of relativity and General relativity.

Special relativity applies to all physical phenomena in the absence of gravity.

General relativity explains the law of gravitation.

Einstein's view was further elaborated by Hermann Minkowski, who demonstrated the geometrical interpretation of all relativistic effects with his concept of four-dimensional spacetime.

 

Here is what you learned from Einstein, the Nobel Laureates, your professors, your books… about length contraction and the twin paradox:

 

Length contraction: a body moving relative to an observer will appear shorter in the direction the body’s traveling.

 

Einstein presented the following thought experiment for Length contraction:

Let A'B' and A"B" be the endpoints of two rods of the same proper length L0, as measured on x' and x" respectively.

Let them move in opposite directions along the x* axis, considered at rest, at the same speed with respect to it. Endpoints A'A" then meet at point A* and B'B" meet at point B*.

Einstein pointed out that length A*B* is shorter than A'B' or A"B", which can also be demonstrated by bringing one of the rods to rest with respect to that axis.

 

This means:

 

“Einstein did not explain the length contraction; he did not find a ‘molecular’ explanation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

The Twin paradox: 

Is a thought experiment in Special relativity with twins, one of whom makes a journey into space in a high-speed rocket and returns home to find that the twin who remained on Earth has aged more. 

It is considered a paradox because being that at constant velocity we are unable to discern which twin is non-traveling and which twin travels.

 

Einstein in his well-known paper on Special relativity in 1905, he considered that when two clocks were brought together and synchronized and then one was moved away and brought back, the clock which had undergone the traveling would be found to be lagging behind the clock which had stayed put. Einstein considered this to be a consequence of time dilation Special relativity, not a paradox.

 

Length contraction in Ferent Quantum Gravity:

 

“The interpretation of Length contraction you have learned from Einstein, from your professors, from your books, from the greatest scientists… is wrong”

Adrian Ferent

 

The equation for an elementary particle made of 2 particles, a Matter particle and a Dark Matter particle, is the Ferent equation for elementary particle as a quantum system:

 

“Ferent equation for elementary particles:”

Adrian Ferent

 

This is a linear partial differential equation that describes the wave function of a quantum-mechanical system made of 2 particles, a Matter particle and a Dark Matter particle.

 

“Ferent equation for elementary particle, made of 2 particles, a Matter particle and a Dark Matter particle, is the Unification between Matter and Dark Matter!”

Adrian Ferent

 

The Lorentz factor:    

 

Values for Lorentz factor γ:

 

For v/c = 0.1,  γ = 1.005

For v/c = 0.5,  γ = 1.155

For v/c = 0.9,  γ = 2.294

 

The length of any object in a moving frame will appear contracted in the direction of motion.

A ‘molecular’ explanation of the Length contraction is needed. Einstein did not give any explanation.

 

Length contraction: the length ∆x′ of an object as measured in the frame in which it is moving, is shorter than its length ∆x in its own rest frame

∆x′ = ∆x / γ

 

Relativistic mass:

m = γm0

 

Time dilation:

∆t′ = γ∆t

 

Relativistic momentum

p = vγm0

 

The de Broglie wavelength:

ʎ = h/p

 

The de Broglie wavelength for the relativistic mass-energy:

ʎ = h/vγm0

 

At high speed the momentum ‘p’ of the object is high and the wavelength is very small.

 

Ferent ‘molecular’ explanation of the Length contraction:

 

The same thing for the molecules inside the object:

 

At high speed the momentum ‘p’ of the molecules is high and the wavelength is very small.

At high speed the momentum ‘p’ of the molecule is high because the relativistic mass of the molecule is high and the speed of the molecule is high: p = vγm0

This means:

 

“At high speed for the molecules inside the object the wavelength is very small, they need less space to oscillate and this explains the Length contraction of the object”

Adrian Ferent

 

The Twin paradox in Ferent Quantum Gravity:

 

Only the twin that accelerates to a speed close to the speed of light will feel the effects.

 

“At high speed because for the molecules inside the body the wavelength is very small the body will contract, cool down and die”

Adrian Ferent

 

“At high speed the mass of the molecules will increase, the mass of the internal organs will increase and the twin will die”

Adrian Ferent

 

That is why:

 

“Space travel at very high speeds close to the speed of light is impossible”

Adrian Ferent

 

“What you learned from Einstein, from your professors, from your books, from the greatest scientists… about the Twin paradox is wrong”

Adrian Ferent

 

Ferent Quantum Gravity:

 

“I quantized the gravitational field with gravitons”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Gravitational field is Gravitons”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Gravitational field is a discrete function”

Adrian Ferent

 

“Gravitational waves are carried by gravitons”

Adrian Ferent

 

Ferent wave equation of the graviton:

 

Ψ – the wave function of the graviton

 

General relativity generalizes special relativity providing a unified description of gravity as a geometric property of space and time.

 

General theory of relativity is the geometric theory of Gravitation published by Einstein in 1915 and is the current description of Gravitation in modern physics.

 

“Gravitation for Einstein is a Geometric theory; Gravitation for Ferent is a Quantum theory, Ferent Quantum Gravity”

Adrian Ferent

 

Conclusion:

What you learned from Einstein, from your professors, from your books, from the greatest scientists… about Gravitation is wrong.

 

“Einstein did not explain the length contraction, the twin paradox and discovered a geometrical interpretation of Gravity not a Quantum interpretation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity (FQG)”

Adrian Ferent

 

390. I am the first who discovered that Einstein did not explain the length contraction, the twin paradox and discovered a geometrical interpretation of Gravity not a Quantum interpretation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity (FQG)

 

391. I am the first who discovered that Einstein did not explain the Length contraction; he did not find a ‘molecular’ explanation like in Ferent Quantum Gravity

 

392. I am the first who discovered that at high speed for the molecules inside the object the wavelength is very small, they need less space to oscillate and this explains the Length contraction of the object

 

393. I am the first who discovered that the interpretation of Length contraction you have learned from Einstein, from your professors, from your books, from the greatest scientists… is wrong

 

394. I am the first who discovered that at high speed because for the molecules inside the body the wavelength is very small the body will contract, cool down and die

 

395. I am the first who discovered that at high speed the mass of the molecules will increase, the mass of the internal organs will increase and the Twin will die

 

396. I am the first who discovered that Space travel at very high speeds close to the speed of light is impossible

 

397. I am the first who discovered that what you learned from Einstein, from your professors, from your books, from the greatest scientists… about the Twin paradox is wrong

 

398. I am the first who discovered that Gravitation for Einstein is a geometric theory; Gravitation for Ferent is a Quantum theory, Ferent Quantum Gravity

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346015283_Einstein_did_not_explain_the_length_contraction_the_twin_paradox_and_did_not_discover_a_Quantum_interpretation_of_Gravity_like_Ferent_Quantum_Gravity