The Positron
“The positron is a positive photon around Ferent electron
that spins in antiMatter direction”
Adrian Ferent
“Ferent Quantum Gravity rejects fields, because it is a
quantum theory!”
Adrian Ferent
“All the Nobel Laureates, the greatest scientists, your
professors do not understand Matter and Antimatter, because they do not
understand what the electron is, what the positron is”
Adrian Ferent
Stupid things what have you learned about Antimatter, from
Nobel Laureates, from the greatest scientists, from your professors, from your
Books, from AI…
Paul Dirac, Richard Feynman, CERN…are wrong about
Antimatter!
Paul Dirac hypothesized
that antiparticles correspond to "holes" in a
"sea" of negative-energy particles
Richard Feynman, building on work by Ernst Stueckelberg,
proposed that antiparticles can be mathematically described as normal
particles moving backward in time.
From CERN - the Big Bang should have created equal amounts
of matter and Antimatter!
CERN, Symmetry Magazine, Sean Carroll from CalTech at the
Fermilab tell us what the Electron is:
An electron is just an Excitation of an electron field!
Carroll’s stunner, at least to many non-scientists, is this:
Every particle is actually a field.
In Ferent Quantum Gravity antiparticles do not have negative
energy
In Ferent Quantum Gravity antiparticles do not move
backwards in time
In Ferent Quantum Gravity the Big Bang did not create equal
amounts of matter and Antimatter
I Discovered what the electron is, what the positron is!
“The electron is a negative photon around Ferent electron
that spins in Matter direction”
Adrian Ferent
“The positron is a positive photon around Ferent electron
that spins in antiMatter direction”
Adrian Ferent
“Because the primordial Black Hole spun in Matter direction,
the majority of Black Holes, Ferent particles spin in Matter direction. That is
why there is more Matter than Antimatter in the Universe”
Adrian Ferent
“What you learned from all Nobel Laureates, from the
greatest scientists, from your professors, from your books…about the Standard
Model, the Elementary particles, the Fermions, Matter, Antimatter, Dark Matter
is wrong”
Adrian Ferent
Comparing Conventional Theory vs. Ferent Quantum Gravity
The Matter-Antimatter Puzzle
CERN’s biggest headache:
if the Big Bang was perfectly symmetrical, the universe
should have annihilated itself instantly, leaving nothing but light.
Standard physics looks for "CP Violation" (tiny
differences in how matter and antimatter behave) to explain why we exist.
Ferent proposal - that the primordial spin of a Black Hole
dictated the dominance of matter - shifts the cause from particle interactions
to the gravitational conditions of the very early universe.
In the Standard Model, an electron is an elementary particle
- it isn't "made" of anything else.
In Ferent Quantum Gravity (FQG), an electron has a composite
structure that changes how we view charge and identity.
The Anatomy of the Electron and Positron
According to Ferent insights, the difference between matter
and antimatter isn't about "backward time" or "negative energy
holes," but rather the direction of internal rotation and the nature of
the photon involved.
The Core: The "Ferent electron" acts as the
central anchor.
The Shell: A negative photon (for electrons) or a positive
photon (for positrons).
The Vector: The spin direction determines the
"Matter" vs. "Antimatter" classification.
Why the "Primordial Spin" Matters
The Standard Model struggles with the Baryon Asymmetry (why
there is more matter than antimatter).
Mainstream physics looks for tiny errors in symmetry during
particle decay.
Ferent explanation suggests a Top-Down cause:
The Universe began with a Primordial Black Hole.
This Black Hole had a specific spin direction (Matter
direction).
This initial condition "polarized" the creation of
particles, making the Ferent particles favor the matter-spin over the
antimatter-spin.
Matter vs. Antimatter Mass
In Ferent framework, the mass of the electron is actually
derived from the energy of the photon trapped in rotation around the Ferent
electron.
The Ferent Electron: Acts as a central "gravity
well" with a much higher speed than light.
The Orbital Photon: Because it is "spinning" in a
localized area, its energy translates into what we perceive as rest mass.
Since I have stated that the electron and positron are
essentially the same structure – just with different photon charges and spin
directions - my theory explains why their masses are identical.
Electron: Negative Photon + Ferent Electron + Matter Spin =
0.511 MeV/c^2
Positron: Positive Photon + Ferent Electron + AntiMatter
Spin = 0.511 MeV/c^2
In this view, mass is localized energy governed by the
Ferent constant, which is much smaller than Planck’s constant.
Comparison of Constants
This perspective suggests that the "Standard
Model" is merely looking at the surface of the "ocean," while
Ferent is looking at the "currents" deep beneath.
QED is about quantum fields:
Electron field - creates electrons and positrons
Electromagnetic field - creates photons
Particles are just excitations of fields.
So: a positron is an excitation of the same field as the
electron
The difference is charge and quantum numbers, not structure
Feynman diagrams (the visual language of QED)
In diagrams:
Positrons are drawn as electrons moving backward in time
This explains why:
They have positive charge
They annihilate with electrons
They appear naturally in calculations
That line is pointing to the Feynman–Stueckelberg
interpretation in particle physics.
In short:
A positron can be mathematically treated as an electron moving backward in
time.
Here’s what that really means:
In Quantum field theory, the equations for electrons allow
solutions with negative energy.
Feynman noticed that instead of thinking about
“negative-energy electrons,” you can reinterpret them as positive-energy
electrons traveling backward in time.
When you flip the time direction in the math, the particle’s
properties flip too - charge becomes positive, so it behaves exactly like a
positron.
In Feynman diagrams:
An electron moving forward in time → normal electron line
An electron moving backward in time → drawn and interpreted
as a positron moving forward in time
Important clarification:
The electron field (Dirac field) creates both electrons and
positrons.
Here’s the clean picture:
In QFT, fields are fundamental, not particles.
The electron field is a single quantum field that:
creates electrons
creates positrons (its antiparticles)
More concretely:
When you quantize the Dirac field:
positive-energy solutions → electron creation operators
negative-energy solutions → reinterpreted as positron
creation operators
This is why:
Electron–positron pair creation and annihilation are natural
and unavoidable
Antiparticles aren’t separate “mirror particles” - they’re
built into the same field
Nice way to summarize it in one sentence:
A single relativistic fermion field necessarily describes
both particles and antiparticles.
“Ferent Quantum Gravity rejects fields, because it is a
quantum theory!”
Adrian Ferent
Interaction with Other Fields
An "electron" is simply a localized vibration (a
quantum) of the electron field.
Uniformity: Because every electron is just a ripple in the
same universal field, every electron in the universe is identical in mass,
charge, and spin.
The electron field doesn't exist in a vacuum; it constantly
"talks" to other fields.
The Electromagnetic Field: When an electron moves or
vibrates, it creates a disturbance in the electromagnetic field (photons).
The Higgs Field: The electron field interacts with the Higgs
field, which is what gives the electron its mass. Without this interaction,
electrons would zip around at the speed of light and never form atoms.
“The Ferent mechanism gives the electron Mass, not the wrong
Higgs mechanism”
Adrian Ferent
“The photon confined inside the electron has mass and
electric charge”
Adrian Ferent
The Mirror Image
The positron is the antiparticle of the electron. In the
underlying field, they are represented by the same wave equation (the Dirac
Equation), but they represent different types of excitations:
Electrons: These are "excitations" or ripples
moving "forward" in time with negative charge.
Positrons: These are effectively "holes" in the
field or excitations that carry a positive charge.
Creation and Annihilation
Because they are ripples in the same fabric, they have a
dramatic relationship.
When an electron ripple and a positron ripple meet, they
don't just bounce off each other - they cancel each other out perfectly.
Annihilation: The two ripples "flatten" the
electron field back to zero, and their combined energy is transferred into the
electromagnetic field, releasing high-energy photons (gamma rays).
Pair Production: Conversely, if you inject enough
concentrated energy (like a high-energy photon) into the vacuum, it can
"kick" the electron field hard enough to create both a ripple
(electron) and a hole (positron) simultaneously.
The "Dirac
Sea" Perspective
A helpful way to visualize this (proposed by Paul Dirac) is
to imagine the universe is an infinitely deep sea of electrons.
An electron is an extra particle sitting on top of the sea.
A positron is a bubble (a hole) where an electron is
missing. When the extra particle falls into the hole, the sea becomes flat again,
and energy is released.
“Dirac equation is wrong, the interpretations of the
solutions are wrong. The Nobel Prize was a Fraud!”
Adrian Ferent
“The matter-antimatter asymmetry problem solved by Ferent
Quantum Gravity”
Adrian Ferent
“The primordial Black Hole spun in Matter direction.
When the primordial Black Hole reached Ferent Density, the
Big Bang started”
Adrian Ferent
“Because the primordial Black Hole spun in Matter direction,
the majority of Black Holes, Ferent particles spin in Matter direction. That is
why there is more Matter than Antimatter in the Universe”
Adrian Ferent
“The electron is a photon around Ferent electron that spins
in Matter direction”
Adrian Ferent
“The positron is a photon around Ferent electron that spins
in antiMatter direction”
Adrian Ferent
“In Ferent Quantum Gravity, Black Holes spin much faster
than the speed of light”
Adrian Ferent
“The majority of Black Holes spin in Matter direction, not
in antiMatter direction.”
Adrian Ferent
“Our Universe is spinning in Matter direction”
Adrian Ferent
“The primordial Black Hole spun in Matter direction.
When the primordial Black Hole reached Ferent Density, the
Big Bang started”
Adrian Ferent
That is why:
The Big Bang should NOT have created equal amounts of
matter and antimatter
“Physicists may find hints as to what this process might be
by studying the subtle differences in the behaviour of matter and antimatter
particles created in high-energy proton collisions at the Large Hadron
Collider. Studying this imbalance could help scientists paint a clearer picture
of why our universe is matter-filled.”
If you look at sky, you see Matter, not Antimatter! This
means the CERN theories are Wrong!
“Dirac equation is wrong, the interpretations of the
solutions are wrong. The Nobel Prize was a Fraud!”
Adrian Ferent
“For Ferent the speed of Gravity is 10^9 times the speed of
light.
For the rest of the world, the speed of Gravity is the speed
of light”
Adrian Ferent
“Planck gave the world one universe. Ferent gave the world
two universes”
Adrian Ferent
“Two important walls:
The Ferent wall: here at time t = 1.294 × 10^(-86) s were
created Ferent Photons.
The Planck wall: here at time t = 5.391 × 10^(-44) s were
created Photons”
Adrian Ferent
“The 1933, 2013,
2017, 2019, 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics are frauds because they did not
understand Gravitation, Ferent Matter and Black Holes”
Adrian Ferent
“The Standard Model is wrong because the electron, the muon,
the down quark and the up quark are not elementary particles”
Adrian Ferent
“I quantized the Gravitational field with Ferent photons”
Adrian Ferent
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/403818825_The_Positron
