The Positron
“The positron is a positive photon around Ferent electron that spins in antiMatter direction”
Adrian Ferent
“Ferent Quantum Gravity rejects fields, because it is a quantum theory!”
Adrian Ferent
“All the Nobel Laureates, the greatest scientists, your professors do not understand Matter and Antimatter, because they do not understand what the electron is, what the positron is”
Adrian Ferent
Stupid things what have you learned about Antimatter, from Nobel Laureates, from the greatest scientists, from your professors, from your Books, from AI…
Paul Dirac, Richard Feynman, CERN…are wrong about Antimatter!
Paul Dirac hypothesized that antiparticles correspond to "holes" in a "sea" of negative-energy particles
Richard Feynman, building on work by Ernst Stueckelberg, proposed that antiparticles can be mathematically described as normal particles moving backward in time.
From CERN - the Big Bang should have created equal amounts of matter and Antimatter!
CERN, Symmetry Magazine, Sean Carroll from CalTech at the Fermilab tell us what the Electron is:
An electron is just an Excitation of an electron field!
Carroll’s stunner, at least to many non-scientists, is this:
Every particle is actually a field.
In Ferent Quantum Gravity antiparticles do not have negative energy
In Ferent Quantum Gravity antiparticles do not move backwards in time
In Ferent Quantum Gravity the Big Bang did not create equal amounts of matter and Antimatter
I Discovered what the electron is, what the positron is!
“The electron is a negative photon around Ferent electron that spins in Matter direction”
Adrian Ferent
“The positron is a positive photon around Ferent electron that spins in antiMatter direction”
Adrian Ferent
“Because the primordial Black Hole spun in Matter direction, the majority of Black Holes, Ferent particles spin in Matter direction. That is why there is more Matter than Antimatter in the Universe”
Adrian Ferent
“What you learned from all Nobel Laureates, from the greatest scientists, from your professors, from your books…about the Standard Model, the Elementary particles, the Fermions, Matter, Antimatter, Dark Matter is wrong”
Adrian Ferent
Comparing Conventional Theory vs. Ferent Quantum Gravity
The Matter-Antimatter Puzzle
CERN’s biggest headache:
if the Big Bang was perfectly symmetrical, the universe should have annihilated itself instantly, leaving nothing but light.
Standard physics looks for "CP Violation" (tiny differences in how matter and antimatter behave) to explain why we exist.
Ferent proposal - that the primordial spin of a Black Hole dictated the dominance of matter - shifts the cause from particle interactions to the gravitational conditions of the very early universe.
In the Standard Model, an electron is an elementary particle - it isn't "made" of anything else.
In Ferent Quantum Gravity (FQG), an electron has a composite structure that changes how we view charge and identity.
The Anatomy of the Electron and Positron
According to Ferent insights, the difference between matter and antimatter isn't about "backward time" or "negative energy holes," but rather the direction of internal rotation and the nature of the photon involved.
The Core: The "Ferent electron" acts as the central anchor.
The Shell: A negative photon (for electrons) or a positive photon (for positrons).
The Vector: The spin direction determines the "Matter" vs. "Antimatter" classification.
Why the "Primordial Spin" Matters
The Standard Model struggles with the Baryon Asymmetry (why there is more matter than antimatter).
Mainstream physics looks for tiny errors in symmetry during particle decay.
Ferent explanation suggests a Top-Down cause:
The Universe began with a Primordial Black Hole.
This Black Hole had a specific spin direction (Matter direction).
This initial condition "polarized" the creation of particles, making the Ferent particles favor the matter-spin over the antimatter-spin.
Matter vs. Antimatter Mass
In Ferent framework, the mass of the electron is actually derived from the energy of the photon trapped in rotation around the Ferent electron.
The Ferent Electron: Acts as a central "gravity well" with a much higher speed than light.
The Orbital Photon: Because it is "spinning" in a localized area, its energy translates into what we perceive as rest mass.
Since I have stated that the electron and positron are essentially the same structure – just with different photon charges and spin directions - my theory explains why their masses are identical.
Electron: Negative Photon + Ferent Electron + Matter Spin = 0.511 MeV/c^2
Positron: Positive Photon + Ferent Electron + AntiMatter Spin = 0.511 MeV/c^2
In this view, mass is localized energy governed by the Ferent constant, which is much smaller than Planck’s constant.
Comparison of Constants
This perspective suggests that the "Standard Model" is merely looking at the surface of the "ocean," while Ferent is looking at the "currents" deep beneath.
QED is about quantum fields:
Electron field - creates electrons and positrons
Electromagnetic field - creates photons
Particles are just excitations of fields.
So: a positron is an excitation of the same field as the electron
The difference is charge and quantum numbers, not structure
Feynman diagrams (the visual language of QED)
In diagrams:
Positrons are drawn as electrons moving backward in time
This explains why:
They have positive charge
They annihilate with electrons
They appear naturally in calculations
That line is pointing to the Feynman–Stueckelberg interpretation in particle physics.
In short:
A positron can be mathematically treated as an electron moving backward in
time.
Here’s what that really means:
In Quantum field theory, the equations for electrons allow solutions with negative energy.
Feynman noticed that instead of thinking about “negative-energy electrons,” you can reinterpret them as positive-energy electrons traveling backward in time.
When you flip the time direction in the math, the particle’s properties flip too - charge becomes positive, so it behaves exactly like a positron.
In Feynman diagrams:
An electron moving forward in time → normal electron line
An electron moving backward in time → drawn and interpreted as a positron moving forward in time
Important clarification:
The electron field (Dirac field) creates both electrons and positrons.
Here’s the clean picture:
In QFT, fields are fundamental, not particles.
The electron field is a single quantum field that:
creates electrons
creates positrons (its antiparticles)
More concretely:
When you quantize the Dirac field:
positive-energy solutions → electron creation operators
negative-energy solutions → reinterpreted as positron creation operators
This is why:
Electron–positron pair creation and annihilation are natural and unavoidable
Antiparticles aren’t separate “mirror particles” - they’re built into the same field
Nice way to summarize it in one sentence:
A single relativistic fermion field necessarily describes both particles and antiparticles.
“Ferent Quantum Gravity rejects fields, because it is a quantum theory!”
Adrian Ferent
Interaction with Other Fields
An "electron" is simply a localized vibration (a quantum) of the electron field.
Uniformity: Because every electron is just a ripple in the same universal field, every electron in the universe is identical in mass, charge, and spin.
The electron field doesn't exist in a vacuum; it constantly "talks" to other fields.
The Electromagnetic Field: When an electron moves or vibrates, it creates a disturbance in the electromagnetic field (photons).
The Higgs Field: The electron field interacts with the Higgs field, which is what gives the electron its mass. Without this interaction, electrons would zip around at the speed of light and never form atoms.
“The Ferent mechanism gives the electron Mass, not the wrong Higgs mechanism”
Adrian Ferent
“The photon confined inside the electron has mass and electric charge”
Adrian Ferent
The Mirror Image
The positron is the antiparticle of the electron. In the underlying field, they are represented by the same wave equation (the Dirac Equation), but they represent different types of excitations:
Electrons: These are "excitations" or ripples moving "forward" in time with negative charge.
Positrons: These are effectively "holes" in the field or excitations that carry a positive charge.
Creation and Annihilation
Because they are ripples in the same fabric, they have a dramatic relationship.
When an electron ripple and a positron ripple meet, they don't just bounce off each other - they cancel each other out perfectly.
Annihilation: The two ripples "flatten" the electron field back to zero, and their combined energy is transferred into the electromagnetic field, releasing high-energy photons (gamma rays).
Pair Production: Conversely, if you inject enough concentrated energy (like a high-energy photon) into the vacuum, it can "kick" the electron field hard enough to create both a ripple (electron) and a hole (positron) simultaneously.
The "
A helpful way to visualize this (proposed by Paul Dirac) is to imagine the universe is an infinitely deep sea of electrons.
An electron is an extra particle sitting on top of the sea.
A positron is a bubble (a hole) where an electron is missing. When the extra particle falls into the hole, the sea becomes flat again, and energy is released.
“Dirac equation is wrong, the interpretations of the solutions are wrong. The Nobel Prize was a Fraud!”
Adrian Ferent
“The matter-antimatter asymmetry problem solved by Ferent Quantum Gravity”
Adrian Ferent
“The primordial Black Hole spun in Matter direction.
When the primordial Black Hole reached Ferent Density, the Big Bang started”
Adrian Ferent
“Because the primordial Black Hole spun in Matter direction, the majority of Black Holes, Ferent particles spin in Matter direction. That is why there is more Matter than Antimatter in the Universe”
Adrian Ferent
“The electron is a photon around Ferent electron that spins in Matter direction”
Adrian Ferent
“The positron is a photon around Ferent electron that spins in antiMatter direction”
Adrian Ferent
“In Ferent Quantum Gravity, Black Holes spin much faster than the speed of light”
Adrian Ferent
“The majority of Black Holes spin in Matter direction, not in antiMatter direction.”
Adrian Ferent
“Our Universe is spinning in Matter direction”
Adrian Ferent
“The primordial Black Hole spun in Matter direction.
When the primordial Black Hole reached Ferent Density, the Big Bang started”
Adrian Ferent
That is why:
The Big Bang should NOT have created equal amounts of matter and antimatter
“Physicists may find hints as to what this process might be by studying the subtle differences in the behaviour of matter and antimatter particles created in high-energy proton collisions at the Large Hadron Collider. Studying this imbalance could help scientists paint a clearer picture of why our universe is matter-filled.”
If you look at sky, you see Matter, not Antimatter! This means the CERN theories are Wrong!
“Dirac equation is wrong, the interpretations of the solutions are wrong. The Nobel Prize was a Fraud!”
Adrian Ferent
“For Ferent the speed of Gravity is 10^9 times the speed of light.
For the rest of the world, the speed of Gravity is the speed of light”
Adrian Ferent
“Planck gave the world one universe. Ferent gave the world two universes”
Adrian Ferent
“Two important walls:
The Ferent wall: here at time t = 1.294 × 10^(-86) s were created Ferent Photons.
The Planck wall: here at time t = 5.391 × 10^(-44) s were created Photons”
Adrian Ferent
“The 1933, 2013, 2017, 2019, 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics are frauds because they did not understand Gravitation, Ferent Matter and Black Holes”
Adrian Ferent
“The Standard Model is wrong because the electron, the muon, the down quark and the up quark are not elementary particles”
Adrian Ferent
“I quantized the Gravitational field with Ferent photons”
Adrian Ferent
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/403818825_The_Positron
